Persepsi Guru dan Siswa terhadap Penerapan Teknologi Mikroskop Virtual dan Simulasi Biologi

Siti Kholisah

doi:10.61116/jiim.v3i3.805

Authors

Siti Kholisah Universitas PGRI Banyuwangi, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61116/jiim.v3i3.805

Keywords:

Persepsi, Guru, Siswa, Teknologi, Mikroskop, Virtual, Simulasi, Biologi

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi guru dan siswa di kelas X SMA Banyuwangi terhadap penggunaan Mikroskop Virtual (MV) dan Simulasi Biologi (misalnya, simulasi pewarisan sifat) sebagai alat bantu pembelajaran. Penggunaan teknologi digital diharapkan dapat mengatasi kendala fasilitas laboratorium dan meningkatkan pemahaman konsep abstrak Biologi. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain Studi Kasus Kualitatif Intrinsik dengan melibatkan 3 Guru Biologi dan 25 Siswa Kelas X IPA dari dua SMA di Banyuwangi. Data dikumpulkan melalui Wawancara Mendalam Semi-Terstruktur, Observasi Kelas, dan Jurnal Refleksi guru dan siswa setelah sesi intervensi menggunakan teknologi MV/Simulasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan persepsi positif yang kuat dari kedua belah pihak terhadap aspek Visualisasi Konsep Abstrak dan Fleksibilitas Akses (belajar tanpa lab). Namun, teridentifikasi adanya hambatan, yaitu (1) Perceived Cognitive Load: Guru menilai siswa mengalami beban kognitif tinggi saat beralih antara simulasi dan konsep buku; dan (2) Digital Native Paradox: Siswa cepat beradaptasi, tetapi cenderung memperlakukan simulasi sebagai video game tanpa melakukan analisis data mendalam. Studi menyimpulkan bahwa efektivitas teknologi MV/Simulasi sangat bergantung pada kemampuan Guru Biologi untuk mengintegrasikannya sebagai alat inkuiri terstruktur, bukan hanya sebagai pengganti alat fisik atau sumber hiburan.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman and Company.

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (4th ed.). Wiley.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.

Dimyati, & Mudjiono. (2015). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta.

Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hadi, S. (2019). Efektivitas Simulasi Interaktif dalam Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(1), 12–25.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Herron, J. D. (1971). The Nature of Scientific Inquiry. School Review, 79(2), 171–212.

Jensen, W. B. (2002). The Nature of Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(1), 14–17.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-Based Learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 317–333). Cambridge University Press.

Lubis, M. Y. (2020). Dampak Persepsi Guru terhadap Adopsi Teknologi Pendidikan. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 15(2), 100–115.

Mayer, R. E. (2014). Principles for Reducing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning: Segmentation, Pre-training, and Modality Principles. Cognitive Science, 38(3), 519–532.

Mulyana, E. (2018). Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Erlbaum.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume V): Effective Policies, Successful Schools. OECD Publishing.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.

Papert, S. (1993). The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. Basic Books.

Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Technology. Erlbaum.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.

Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-Regulation and Academic Learning: Self-Efficacy Enhancing Interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 631–649). Academic Press.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications.

Subiantoro, M. D. (2021). Peran Guru sebagai Mediator Inkuiri dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Teknologi. Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran, 14(3), 50–65.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Supriadi, H. (2009). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (PBM) dalam Sains. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 16(2), 100–115.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2013). Kekuatan dan Kegagalan Pendidikan Indonesia. Kompas Media Nusantara.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wahyuni, S. (2020). Pengaruh Visualisasi 3D terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Sel Siswa SMA. Jurnal Biologi Indonesia, 6(2), 70–85.

Wong, A. F. L., & Looi, C. K. (2011). Integrating Technology in the Classroom: An Annotated Bibliography on Learning and Teaching with Technology. National Institute of Education.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.

Zou, Y., & Chen, G. (2016). The Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratory in Science Education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 32–45.